agricultural and food controversies: what everyone needs to know

Open Preview

See a Problem?

We'd love your help. Let united states of america know what's incorrect with this preview of Agricultural and Food Controversies past F. Bailey Norwood.

Thank you for telling united states of america about the problem.

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Be the get-go to inquire a question about Agricultural and Food Controversies

Community Reviews

· xxx ratings · 6 reviews

Start your review of Agricultural and Food Controversies: What Everyone Needs to Know(r)

Aug 05, 2015 Bob rated it it was ok

This book had such promise. I was really looking for a balanced view of the food and agriculture debates and, on the surface, this book Really seemed to fit the pecker. Then I read it. :)

Essentially, each affiliate begins by explaining a sure controversy (GMOs, the farm bill, eating local, etc). So far so practiced. The summary of each event is expert and the authors are manifestly educated almost the topics. This is what earned the book a minimum of 2 stars.

However, the remainder of each chapter essentially a

This volume had such promise. I was really looking for a balanced view of the nutrient and agriculture debates and, on the surface, this book Really seemed to fit the nib. Then I read it. :)

Essentially, each affiliate begins by explaining a certain controversy (GMOs, the subcontract beak, eating local, etc). So far then good. The summary of each issue is skilful and the authors are apparently educated about the topics. This is what earned the book a minimum of 2 stars.

Yet, the residue of each chapter essentially argues whether the controversy is legit or not. In this section the arguments really showtime to contradict each other. They say things in one sentence similar: we have full trust in corporations and regulators to continue our nutrient rubber.... and then a few paragraphs later they'll say: it is true that Monsanto is beholden to it's stake holders and aims to make a profit above everything else including responsibleness for the environment.

They'll then say something similar: it's bully that nutrient advocates exist because they go along corporations honest and regulators on top of things. But then they proceed to say that without food advocates corporations would do the right thing anyway because it benefits them. What?!

The chapter on the farm bill is an fifty-fifty bigger joke. They claim that if we stopped subsidizing corn and soy that, essentially, people would eat just as much junk food. Actually? So that cheap junk food would stay inexpensive with no subsidies and farmers would continue to grow just as much corn? It just gets to the signal where they're talking jibberish.

The book says endless times "if you lot don't trust corporations to do the correct thing on their ain, then maybe our nutrient isn't safe. Just we do trust them. So information technology is."

Yikes. Seriously?

Every chapter ends by basically telling you that corporations volition do the right thing and if they don't, well, the side by side round of biotech will fix everything...or regulators volition fix information technology eventually. They never come up to the obvious conclusion that, well, maybe Big Ag isn't practiced! And in fact may exist the problem all forth!

I don't mind someone terminal that our food arrangement is safe (I think for the most part it is). I do heed them making contradictory arguments and then stating a forgone conclusion.

If this wasn't published by Oxford Univ. Press, I'd say this volume was paid for past Monsanto and their pals. The conclusions y'all're given are THAT lopsided.

If y'all want to hear what it sounds like when big ag argues they're just as practiced (or improve!) for anybody as organic growers and small farms...this book is for you.

...more than

A fairly counterbalanced look at a number of agricultural and food controversies (e.g., pesticides, antibiotics and hormones given to livestock, fertilizers). The authors presented each issue from both ideological sides, although they tended to favor corporate interests. Nonetheless, this book all the same gave me quite a bit to think about, and information technology provided some compelling evidence that challenges or complicates many of the claims made by food activists. Overall, I recommend this to anyone interested in food and A fairly balanced await at a number of agricultural and nutrient controversies (e.g., pesticides, antibiotics and hormones given to livestock, fertilizers). The authors presented each result from both ideological sides, although they tended to favor corporate interests. However, this book nevertheless gave me quite a flake to think almost, and information technology provided some compelling evidence that challenges or complicates many of the claims fabricated past nutrient activists. Overall, I recommend this to anyone interested in food and agriculture, if but to get a slightly more counterbalanced narrative than what is typical in most publications on the topic. ...more than

science-based, quality data about important food issues

Jul 17, 2016 Trey Malone rated information technology information technology was amazing

Any time you try to write a book nearly controversy, you are asking for... controversy. If y'all are picking this book up in the first place, you probably have some kind of opinion on food and agriculture. As such, of form there are going to be things you might non agree with in this book. Each chapter was then well researched by the authors (who are all experts in this field) that access to the reference lists alone are worth the toll of the text. What I liked the most was how the authors did the Any time you attempt to write a book about controversy, you are asking for... controversy. If you are picking this book up in the first place, you probably take some kind of opinion on food and agriculture. Equally such, of course there are going to be things you might non agree with in this book. Each chapter was so well researched past the authors (who are all experts in this field) that admission to the reference lists alone are worth the price of the text. What I liked the most was how the authors did their best to necktie modernistic hot-push button topics into a historical narrative.

I'd especially recommend this book for anyone craving a nuanced-but-short clarification of food and agronomical issues written by experts, and for anyone wanting to do real research in agriculture (particularly because the references are such solid starting points).

...more

Aug 07, 2015 Marian rated it information technology was amazing

This is a great dive into electric current food controversies. Is organic food healthier? Are pesticides safe? Although they ofttimes conclude that activists concerns are misguided, they are respectful and say debate and skepticism are of import in a healthy republic.

Apr 20, 2016 Bethany N. rated information technology did not like information technology

My forthcoming research into the many claims of this volume will be thorough and well researched, with adequately cited sources - as I would have hoped from such an educated writer biography.